All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Gene capture by transposable elements leads to epigenetic conflict in maize

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14740%2F21%3A00124291" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14740/21:00124291 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674205220303828?via%3Dihub" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674205220303828?via%3Dihub</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2020.11.003" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.molp.2020.11.003</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Gene capture by transposable elements leads to epigenetic conflict in maize

  • Original language description

    Transposable elements (TEs) regularly capture fragments of genes. When the host silences these TEs, siRNAs homologous to the captured regions may also target the genes. This epigenetic crosstalk establishes an intragenomic conflict: silencing the TEs has the cost of silencing the genes. If genes are important, however, natural selection may maintain function by moderating the silencing response, which may also advantage the TEs. In this study, we examined this model by focusing on Helitrons, Pack-MULEs, and Sirevirus LTR retrotransposons in the maize genome. We documented 1263 TEs containing exon fragments from 1629 donor genes. Consistent with epigenetic conflict, donor genes mapped more siRNAs and were more methylated than genes with no evidence of capture. However, these patterns differed between syntelog versus translocated donor genes. Syntelogs appeared to maintain function, as measured by gene expression, consistent with moderation of silencing for functionally important genes. Epigenetic marks did not spread beyond their captured regions and 24nt crosstalk siRNAs were linked with CHH methylation. Translocated genes, in contrast, bore the signature of silencing. They were highly methylated and less expressed, but also overrepresented among donor genes and located away from chromosomal arms, which suggests a link between capture and gene movement. Splitting genes into potential functional categories based on evolutionary constraint supported the synteny-based findings. TE families captured genes in different ways, but the evidence for their advantage was generally less obvious; nevertheless, TEs with captured fragments were older, mapped fewer siRNAs, and were slightly less methylated than TEs without captured fragments. Collectively, our results argue that TE capture triggers an intragenomic conflict that may not affect the function of important genes but may lead to the pseudogenization of less-constrained genes.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10608 - Biochemistry and molecular biology

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Molecular Plant

  • ISSN

    1674-2052

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    14

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    2

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    16

  • Pages from-to

    237-252

  • UT code for WoS article

    000625105600011

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85097870115