All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Closing Argument as Multimodal Oratory: Insights from the Chauvin Trial

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25210%2F23%3A39921135" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25210/23:39921135 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11196-023-09984-z" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11196-023-09984-z</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-09984-z" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11196-023-09984-z</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Closing Argument as Multimodal Oratory: Insights from the Chauvin Trial

  • Original language description

    The paper examines selected aspects of the defence closing argument in a highly publicised criminal trial to illustrate the orchestration of various semiotic resources in legal persuasion and to explain their role in the creation of meaning. The study demonstrates that closing arguments are multimodal performances whose persuasiveness results from the combination of modes (speech, image, video, gaze, gesture, posture, proxemics) which contextualise and strengthen one another, rather than language alone. Drawing on earlier research into multimodality, courtroom rhetoric and proximity in disciplinary genres, the analysis centres on the ways in which the defence counsel controls the rhetorical features of his narrative and constructs himself and the audience as people with similar understandings and goals. The study specifically demonstrates how the counsel constructs the proximity of commitment, the proximity of membership and the proximity of experience. It explores such facets of proximity as: organisation, argument structure, credibility, stance and engagement, and identifies key rhetorical strategies used to achieve the intended communicative effect. The analysis clearly shows that the persuasiveness of the counsel&apos;s performance depends on the synchronisation of a range of meaning-making resources, which, if used in isolation, would result in a much less engaging argument.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60203 - Linguistics

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2023

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    International Journal for the Semiotics of Law

  • ISSN

    0952-8059

  • e-ISSN

    1572-8722

  • Volume of the periodical

    36

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    3

  • Country of publishing house

    NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS

  • Number of pages

    37

  • Pages from-to

    1109-1145

  • UT code for WoS article

    000971868800001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database