All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Pairwise judgments consistency impact on quality of multi-criteria group decision-making with AHP

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25410%2F19%3A39915139" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25410/19:39915139 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://dspace.tul.cz/bitstream/handle/15240/154272/EM_4_2019_13.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y" target="_blank" >https://dspace.tul.cz/bitstream/handle/15240/154272/EM_4_2019_13.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2019-4-013" target="_blank" >10.15240/tul/001/2019-4-013</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Pairwise judgments consistency impact on quality of multi-criteria group decision-making with AHP

  • Original language description

    The scope of this research encompasses issues associated with group decision making (GDM) as the most challenging process which entails various viewpoints and preferences of individuals that must be taken into consideration and somehow combined into one meaningful outcome. When GDM is taken into consideration, the AHP seems to be a particularly attractive methodology. From the perspective of its applications, an existing research gap has been identified and examined in this research paper. Thus, the inconsistency of judgments impact on priority vector quality has been examined from the perspective of group decision making. Examination results generalize to the synthesized pairwise comparison matrix that is obtained on the basis of individual pairwise comparison matrices for all group members. The examination process has proceeded with the application of Monte Carlo simulations coded and executed in Wolfram Mathematica Software. Having in mind that a consistency index for the PCM denoting group preferences cannot be greater than the consistency index of the most inconsistent individual PCM it became possible to designate the credibility of the priority vector for the group on the basis of the most inconsistent individual PCM. It is emphasized that thus far only a few papers have dealt with the problem concerning the relation between a level of the pairwise judgments inconsistency and the degree of possible estimation errors for established vector of priority ratios. This research paper overcomes limitations of other examinations which distinguishes it from other papers and emphasizes its novelty.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50204 - Business and management

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2019

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    E+M Ekonomie a Management

  • ISSN

    1212-3609

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    22

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    4

  • Country of publishing house

    CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC

  • Number of pages

    18

  • Pages from-to

    195-212

  • UT code for WoS article

    000500931600013

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database