MCDM-Based Wildfire Risk Assessment: A Case Study on the State of Arizona
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25510%2F23%3A39921000" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25510/23:39921000 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2571-6255/6/12/449" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/2571-6255/6/12/449</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/fire6120449" target="_blank" >10.3390/fire6120449</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
MCDM-Based Wildfire Risk Assessment: A Case Study on the State of Arizona
Original language description
The increasing frequency of wildfires has posed significant challenges to communities worldwide. The effectiveness of all aspects of disaster management depends on a credible estimation of the prevailing risk. Risk, the product of a hazard’s likelihood and its potential consequences, encompasses the probability of hazard occurrence, the exposure of assets to these hazards, existing vulnerabilities that amplify the consequences, and the capacity to manage, mitigate, and recover from their consequences. This paper employs the multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework, which produces reliable results and allows for the customization of the relative importance of factors based on expert opinions. Utilizing the AROMAN algorithm, the study ranks counties in the state of Arizona according to their wildfire risk, drawing upon 25 factors categorized into expected annual loss, community resilience, and social vulnerability. A sensitivity analysis demonstrates the stability of the results when model parameters are altered, reinforcing the robustness of this approach in disaster risk assessment. While the paper primarily focuses on enhancing the safety of human communities in the context of wildfires, it highlights the versatility of the methodology, which can be applied to other natural hazards and accommodate more subjective risk and safety assessments
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
20701 - Environmental and geological engineering, geotechnics
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2023
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Fire-Switzerland
ISSN
2571-6255
e-ISSN
2571-6255
Volume of the periodical
6
Issue of the periodical within the volume
12
Country of publishing house
CH - SWITZERLAND
Number of pages
18
Pages from-to
1-18
UT code for WoS article
001135931400001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85180675499