All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Validation of human error probabilities with statistical analysis of misbehaviors

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26210%2F12%3APU99487" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26210/12:PU99487 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Validation of human error probabilities with statistical analysis of misbehaviors

  • Original language description

    There is used the term human error probability in the field of safety engineering. Hollnagel (2002) defined it like the probability that a person will correctly perform some system-required activity during a given time period (assuming time is a limiting factor) without performing any extraneous activity that can degrade the system. There is a lot of methods, how to determine human error probability. The methods have been used to predict human error of high risk operation. In the study of HSE (2009) there was identified more than 70 potential human reliability method. Of these, 37 were excluded from any further investigation and 35 were identified as potentially relevant to HSE major hazard directorates and were investigated fully. The quantification of human error probability is based on having statistically relevant data of human tasks and the associated error rates, using of databases and call off the required values by expert estimation. For a very simple task, there are many possible results from each method, and one of the reasons is, that it is difficult to validate value of human error probability. But this problem can be solid with statistical analysis of misbehaviors of specific employees. Statistical aapproach allows validating the likelihood of human error (for specific employee) both in qualitative tasks (e.g. opening of valve) as well as quantitative tasks (e.g. error of reading the value from the measuring instrument in the process unit operation).

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    CF - Physical chemistry and theoretical chemistry

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/ED0002%2F01%2F01" target="_blank" >ED0002/01/01: NETME Centre (New Technologies for Mechanical Engineering)</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2012

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Procedia Engineering

  • ISSN

    1877-7058

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    2012

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    42

  • Country of publishing house

    NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS

  • Number of pages

    5

  • Pages from-to

    1955-1959

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database