All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Influence of MR damper response time on semiactive suspension control efficiency

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26210%2F15%3APU113260" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26210/15:PU113260 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11012-015-0139-7" target="_blank" >http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11012-015-0139-7</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11012-015-0139-7" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11012-015-0139-7</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Influence of MR damper response time on semiactive suspension control efficiency

  • Original language description

    This paper tries to find the reasons of differences between results from semiactive suspension simulations and from real measurements. Simulations of semiactive algorithms which have already been published in many scientific papers have showned a great potential for improvement of the suspension quality. However, experiments with suspension controlled by semiactive algorithms which are supposed to improve grip did not bring any benefits. The reason of algorithm failure seems to be the response time of the damper used in the suspension. This paper compares the quality of suspension using three different semiactive algorithms (Skyhook, Groundhook, modified Groundhook) and passive settings for different damping levels. All the simulations were conducted for three different response times of MR damper: 1.5, 8 and 20 ms. Response time 20 ms is usual for commercial MR dampers control. Response time 8 ms corresponds to commercial MR dampers which are controlled by the newly developed PWM controller. Response time 1.5 ms corresponds to the fastest available MR devices. Simulations show a significant influence of the MR damper response time on the suspension quality if semiactive algorithms are used. The simulations are confirmed by measurements on a quarter car suspension controlled by modified Groundhook algorithm using MR damper with response time 8 and 20 ms.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    20301 - Mechanical engineering

Result continuities

  • Project

    Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2015

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    MECCANICA

  • ISSN

    0025-6455

  • e-ISSN

    1572-9648

  • Volume of the periodical

    50

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    8

  • Country of publishing house

    IT - ITALY

  • Number of pages

    11

  • Pages from-to

    1949-1959

  • UT code for WoS article

    000358326800002

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-84938207575