All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Comparison of two inlet boundary approaches in numerical simulation of car ventilation outlet flow

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26210%2F15%3APU117371" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26210/15:PU117371 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/abs/2016/09/epjconf_efm2016_02120/epjconf_efm2016_02120.html" target="_blank" >https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/abs/2016/09/epjconf_efm2016_02120/epjconf_efm2016_02120.html</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201611402120" target="_blank" >10.1051/epjconf/201611402120</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Comparison of two inlet boundary approaches in numerical simulation of car ventilation outlet flow

  • Original language description

    The paper is concerned with the comparison of two inlet boundary approaches of numerical simulations. The first approach is based on the simulation of a sufficiently long duct upstream the area of interest with known volumetric flow rate. The second approach rests on the experimental measurement of the section closer to the area of interest. The experimental measurement provides velocity profile and in addition turbulent intensity compared to the first approach where only a velocity profile can be computed according to known volumetric flow rate. A simplified model of car ventilation outlet was chosen as a test case. The model consists of circular and rectangular duct, area of interest (closing flap, vertical slats and horizontal slats) and outlet box. We have compared the two mentioned inlet boundary approaches for two distinct values of volumetric flow rate for which the experimental data of the section upstream of the area of interest are available. The velocity and the turbulent kinetic energy profiles downstream of the area of interest were chosen as comparative characteristics.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10305 - Fluids and plasma physics (including surface physics)

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA13-27505S" target="_blank" >GA13-27505S: Meshfree technique with Large Eddy Simulation for fluid dynamics and computational aeroacoustics</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2015

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    Proceedings of the International conference Experimental Fluid Mechanics 2015

  • ISBN

  • ISSN

    2100-014X

  • e-ISSN

  • Number of pages

    4

  • Pages from-to

    788-791

  • Publisher name

    EDP Sciences

  • Place of publication

    Liberec

  • Event location

    Praha

  • Event date

    Nov 17, 2015

  • Type of event by nationality

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • UT code for WoS article

    000400395300122