Comparison of two inlet boundary approaches in numerical simulation of car ventilation outlet flow
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26210%2F15%3APU117371" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26210/15:PU117371 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/abs/2016/09/epjconf_efm2016_02120/epjconf_efm2016_02120.html" target="_blank" >https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/abs/2016/09/epjconf_efm2016_02120/epjconf_efm2016_02120.html</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201611402120" target="_blank" >10.1051/epjconf/201611402120</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Comparison of two inlet boundary approaches in numerical simulation of car ventilation outlet flow
Original language description
The paper is concerned with the comparison of two inlet boundary approaches of numerical simulations. The first approach is based on the simulation of a sufficiently long duct upstream the area of interest with known volumetric flow rate. The second approach rests on the experimental measurement of the section closer to the area of interest. The experimental measurement provides velocity profile and in addition turbulent intensity compared to the first approach where only a velocity profile can be computed according to known volumetric flow rate. A simplified model of car ventilation outlet was chosen as a test case. The model consists of circular and rectangular duct, area of interest (closing flap, vertical slats and horizontal slats) and outlet box. We have compared the two mentioned inlet boundary approaches for two distinct values of volumetric flow rate for which the experimental data of the section upstream of the area of interest are available. The velocity and the turbulent kinetic energy profiles downstream of the area of interest were chosen as comparative characteristics.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
D - Article in proceedings
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10305 - Fluids and plasma physics (including surface physics)
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/GA13-27505S" target="_blank" >GA13-27505S: Meshfree technique with Large Eddy Simulation for fluid dynamics and computational aeroacoustics</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2015
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Article name in the collection
Proceedings of the International conference Experimental Fluid Mechanics 2015
ISBN
—
ISSN
2100-014X
e-ISSN
—
Number of pages
4
Pages from-to
788-791
Publisher name
EDP Sciences
Place of publication
Liberec
Event location
Praha
Event date
Nov 17, 2015
Type of event by nationality
WRD - Celosvětová akce
UT code for WoS article
000400395300122