All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Experimental verification of boundary conditions for numerical simulation of airflow in a benchmark ventilation channel

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26210%2F16%3APU121781" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26210/16:PU121781 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2016/09/epjconf_efm2016_02067.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2016/09/epjconf_efm2016_02067.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201611402067" target="_blank" >10.1051/epjconf/201611402067</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Experimental verification of boundary conditions for numerical simulation of airflow in a benchmark ventilation channel

  • Original language description

    Correct definition of boundary conditions is crucial for the appropriate simulation of a flow. It is a common practice that simulation of sufficiently long upstream entrance section is performed instead of experimental investigation of the actual conditions at the boundary of the examined area, in the case that the measurement is either impossible or extremely demanding. We focused on the case of a benchmark channel with ventilation outlet, which models a regular automotive ventilation system. At first, measurements of air velocity and turbulence intensity were performed at the boundary of the examined area, i.e. in the rectangular channel 272.5 mm upstream the ventilation outlet. Then, the experimentally acquired results were compared with results obtained by numerical simulation of further upstream entrance section defined according to generally approved theoretical suggestions. The comparison showed that despite the simple geometry and general agreement of average axial velocity, certain difference was found in the shape of the velocity profile. The difference was attributed to the simplifications of the numerical model and the isotropic turbulence assumption of the used turbulence model. The appropriate recommendations were stated for the future work.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    20704 - Energy and fuels

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/LO1202" target="_blank" >LO1202: NETME CENTRE PLUS</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2016

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    EPJ Web of conferences

  • ISBN

  • ISSN

    2100-014X

  • e-ISSN

  • Number of pages

    4

  • Pages from-to

    1-4

  • Publisher name

    EDP Sciences

  • Place of publication

    Neuveden

  • Event location

    Praha

  • Event date

    Nov 17, 2015

  • Type of event by nationality

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • UT code for WoS article

    000400395300069