All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Comparison of hill-climbing and genetic algorithms for digital predistortion models sizing

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26220%2F16%3APU120890" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26220/16:PU120890 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7841189" target="_blank" >https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7841189</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICECS.2016.3046" target="_blank" >10.1109/ICECS.2016.3046</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Comparison of hill-climbing and genetic algorithms for digital predistortion models sizing

  • Original language description

    Generalized Memory Polynomial (GMP) models are widely used for the linearization of power amplifiers. They offer a good tradeoff between linearization performance and implementation complexity. Their structure is defined by 8 integer parameters representing different non-linearity orders and memory lengths. These 8 degrees of freedom allow achieving very good linearization performance with a small number of coefficients. But the optimal sizing (determination of the 8 parameters) of such models could require huge computation, for instance, if these 8 parameters are bounded between 1 and 10, there are 108 models to test using an exhaustive search, which is very computationally heavy and time consuming. Therefore optimization algorithms are needed to search for a GMP model structure which provides a good tradeoff between modeling accuracy and complexity. In this paper, we compare two heuristic optimization algorithms, hillclimbing and integer genetic algorithms, in terms of convergence speed, and optimality of the obtained solution regarding the defined criterion. They are evaluated using data measurements from an LDMOS Doherty Power Amplifier dedicated to base stations. The results show that both algorithms allow decreasing very significantly the searching time while giving optimal or close to optimal solutions. Compared with hill-climbing, the genetic approach leads to a more difficult control and interpretation of the path followed by the search algorithm since it is based on random operations (crossovers and mutations).

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    20201 - Electrical and electronic engineering

Result continuities

  • Project

    Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2016

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    23rd Electronics, Circuits, and Systems (ICECS), 2016 IEEE International Conference on

  • ISBN

    978-1-5090-6113-6

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

  • Number of pages

    4

  • Pages from-to

    289-292

  • Publisher name

    IEEE

  • Place of publication

    Monte Carlo

  • Event location

    Monte Carlo

  • Event date

    Nov 7, 2016

  • Type of event by nationality

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • UT code for WoS article

    000399230200073