All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Information technology students’ metadiscourse:: Boosting and hedging in classroom argumentative debates

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26220%2F25%3APU151948" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26220/25:PU151948 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.fil.bg.ac.rs/volume.php?pt=journals&issue=esptoday-2025-13-1&i=7" target="_blank" >https://doi.fil.bg.ac.rs/volume.php?pt=journals&issue=esptoday-2025-13-1&i=7</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2025.13.1.7" target="_blank" >10.18485/esptoday.2025.13.1.7</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Information technology students’ metadiscourse:: Boosting and hedging in classroom argumentative debates

  • Original language description

    Despite many empirical studies focusing on English as a second language (L2) learners’ use of different metadiscourse markers in general academic English contexts, a systematic analysis of co-existing discourse strategies of boosting and hedging that contribute substantially to the dynamic flow of conversation in English for specific purposes (ESP) contexts is still missing. Understanding how ESP learners use boosters and hedges in conversation might provide valuable insights into their pragmatic competence. Therefore, this study scrutinizes the functions of boosters and hedges employed by information technology (IT) students in classroom argumentative debates related in content to their discipline. Boosters and hedges were identified and analysed using Sketch Engine. A total of 34 IT students participated in 8 debates in the course English for IT at Brno University of Technology. The whole corpus of the transcribed debates includes 20,052 tokens and 17,016 words. The research results revealed that while boosters were used by IT students to enhance persuasive communication, express stance, and share professional knowledge within their discourse community, hedges were employed to acknowledge the potential gaps in their understanding of the ever-changing nature of IT and mitigate face-threatening acts performed when asserting and rebutting in the debates.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60203 - Linguistics

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    ESP Today-Journal of English for Specific Purposes at Tertiary Level

  • ISSN

    2334-9050

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    13

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    RS - THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA

  • Number of pages

    22

  • Pages from-to

    134-155

  • UT code for WoS article

    001377450500007

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-105000298041