Can LLMs Extract Human-like Fine-grained Evidence for Evidence-based Fact-checking?
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26230%2F26%3A0201605" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26230/26:0201605 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://raslan2025.nlp-consulting.net/" target="_blank" >https://raslan2025.nlp-consulting.net/</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Can LLMs Extract Human-like Fine-grained Evidence for Evidence-based Fact-checking?
Original language description
Misinformation frequently spreads in user comments under online news articles, highlighting the need for effective methods to detect factually incorrect information. To strongly support or refute claims extracted from such comments, it is necessary to identify relevant documents and pinpoint the exact text spans that justify or contradict each claim. This paper focuses on the latter task --- fine-grained evidence extraction for Czech and Slovak claims. We create new dataset, containing two-way annotated fine-grained evidence created by paid annotators. We evaluate large language models (LLMs) on this dataset to assess their alignment with human annotations. The results reveal that LLMs often fail to copy evidence verbatim from the source text, leading to invalid outputs. Error-rate analysis shows that the llama3.1:8b model achieves a high proportion of correct outputs despite its relatively small size, while the gpt-oss-120b model underperforms despite having many more parameters. Furthermore, the models qwen3:14b, deepseek-r1:32b, and gpt-oss:20b demonstrate an effective balance between model size and alignment with human annotations.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
D - Article in proceedings
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/TQ16000028" target="_blank" >TQ16000028: FactDeMice – Evidence-based Fact-Checking with Fact-consistent translation, Fake Review Detection, and Automatic Misinformative Claim Extraction</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Article name in the collection
Proceedings of the Nineteenth Workshop on Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Languages Processing, RASLAN 2025
ISBN
978-80-263-1858-3
ISSN
2336-4289
e-ISSN
—
Number of pages
11
Pages from-to
25-36
Publisher name
—
Place of publication
—
Event location
Borovets
Event date
Feb 16, 2005
Type of event by nationality
WRD - Celosvětová akce
UT code for WoS article
—