All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Thomson scattering versus modeling of the microwave plasma torch: a long standing discrepancy almost solved

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26620%2F20%3APU137434" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26620/20:PU137434 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/00216224:14310/20:00117958

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2020/ja/d0ja00161a#!divAbstract" target="_blank" >https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2020/ja/d0ja00161a#!divAbstract</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0ja00161a" target="_blank" >10.1039/d0ja00161a</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Thomson scattering versus modeling of the microwave plasma torch: a long standing discrepancy almost solved

  • Original language description

    The characterization of plasmas gives much more insight if the results of modeling are compared with those of experiments. In the past, several modeling-experiment studies were performed on the microwave plasma torch (MPT). For the modeling a Global Plasma Model (GPM) was employed and for the experiment Thomson scattering (TS) was used. The same GPM-TS comparison was successfully applied to several other, more robust plasmas. However for the MPT it was found that the comparison led to severe discrepancies. The most salient feature was that the value of the electron temperature,T-e, found by TS, was substantially higher than what GPMs predicted. Several attempts were undertaken to solve this problem by refining the model and its most important input: the gradient of the electron density. The attention for the model implied that the TS technique was not scrutinized sufficiently. Recently it was discovered that the outcome of TS is very sensitive to the spectral fitting procedure. In the past this was carried out by employing the calibrated intensity using Gaussian fitting. However, a procedure based on the fitting of the spectral shape by using modified Gaussian fitting gives better results and leads to a lowerT(e)value, more in the range of the GPM results. This paper discusses the background of the GPM and gives the basis of TS fitting procedures and an analysis of the systematic error that can be made when TS is performed on filamentary MPT-like plasmas.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10305 - Fluids and plasma physics (including surface physics)

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/LQ1601" target="_blank" >LQ1601: CEITEC 2020</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2020

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry

  • ISSN

    0267-9477

  • e-ISSN

    1364-5544

  • Volume of the periodical

    35

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    9

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    11

  • Pages from-to

    2064-2074

  • UT code for WoS article

    000569703600027

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database