All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Transrectal versus transperineal prostate fusion biopsy: a pair-matched analysis to evaluate accuracy and complications

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00843989%3A_____%2F24%3AE0111092" target="_blank" >RIV/00843989:_____/24:E0111092 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/61988987:17110/24:A2503AE9

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00345-024-05245-1" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00345-024-05245-1</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05245-1" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00345-024-05245-1</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Transrectal versus transperineal prostate fusion biopsy: a pair-matched analysis to evaluate accuracy and complications

  • Original language description

    Purpose: To evaluate biopsy-related complications and detection rates of any PCa and clinically significant PCa (csPCa, intended as grade group ? 2) between MRI-targeted TP fusion biopsies (TPBx) and TR ones (TRBx). Methods: We performed a multicentric study on 4841 patients who underwent fusion biopsy between 2016 and 2023. A case-control matching was performed to find comparable cohorts of 646 TPBx and 646 TRBx. Mean T test and Pearson chi-square tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between the cohorts, except for target location with a higher rate of anterior lesions in TPBx group. Complications were rare and no difference was found between the groups, with similar rates of infections after TRBx and TPBx (N = 5 (0.8%) vs N = 2 (0.3%), p 0.45). All patients in TRBx and 90.1% in TPBx group received antibiotic prophylaxis. A higher csPCa detection rate was found in TPBx over the group (50.5% vs 36.2%, p < 0.001). On average, positive targeted cores were increased in TPBx group, for any PCa (1.6 vs 1.4, p 0.04) and csPCa (1.0 vs 0.8, p 0.02). Among the limitations of study, we acknowledge the retrospective design and the possible under-reporting of complications. Conclusions: MRI-targeted fusion TPBx achieves a significantly higher csPCa detection than TRBx, with a diagnostic advantage for apical and anterior lesions. No significant differences were found in terms of complications that were rare in both groups, considering a widespread adoption of antibiotic prophylaxis.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30217 - Urology and nephrology

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2024

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    World journal of urology

  • ISSN

    0724-4983

  • e-ISSN

    1433-8726

  • Volume of the periodical

    42

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    article 535

  • Country of publishing house

    DE - GERMANY

  • Number of pages

    8

  • Pages from-to

    1-8

  • UT code for WoS article

    001326607300001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85204906413