Nudging Domestic Judicial Reforms from Strasbourg: How the European Court of Human Rights shapes domestic judicial design
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26479800%3A_____%2F18%3AN0000003" target="_blank" >RIV/26479800:_____/18:N0000003 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216224:14220/17:00096600
Result on the web
<a href="http://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.368" target="_blank" >http://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.368</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Nudging Domestic Judicial Reforms from Strasbourg: How the European Court of Human Rights shapes domestic judicial design
Original language description
This article discusses to what extent and how the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has initiated and engaged in domestic judicial reforms. It shows that the judgments of the Strasbourg Court, rather than having effects only with respect to the individual whose rights have been violated, have much deeper structural effects in the design and operation of domestic judicial systems. This article argues that this phenomenon goes rather unnoticed, but it has deep implications for both the developing and developed European democracies. To demonstrate this phenomenon, this article assesses the impact of the ECtHR on three judicial design issues. First, it illustrates how the ECtHR has challenged the role of the advocates general. Second, it explains how the ECtHR has gradually curbed the jurisdiction of military courts both over civilians and over military officers, which has brought these courts to the brink of their abolition. Finally, it outlines how the ECtHR in its judgments regarding the disciplining of judges empowers the judiciary at the expense of other political institutions within the State. Based on the analysis of these three judicial design issues, we conclude that the Strasbourg Court is affecting the internal architecture of domestic judiciaries as it gradually endorses the unification of court administration and changes the power structures within the judiciary.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>ost</sub> - Miscellaneous article in a specialist periodical
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50501 - Law
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/GP13-07384P" target="_blank" >GP13-07384P: Judicial Discipline in Transition: Lessons from the Czech Republic</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2018
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Utrecht University School of Law
ISSN
1871-515X
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
—
Issue of the periodical within the volume
Volume 13 | Issue 1, 2017
Country of publishing house
DE - GERMANY
Number of pages
12
Pages from-to
112-123
UT code for WoS article
—
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—