How do Latin American States Engage with Responsibility to Protect Norms? A Typology of Positions
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F26482789%3A_____%2F23%3A10152644" target="_blank" >RIV/26482789:_____/23:10152644 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://cjir.iir.cz/index.php/cjir/article/view/748" target="_blank" >https://cjir.iir.cz/index.php/cjir/article/view/748</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.32422/cjir.748" target="_blank" >10.32422/cjir.748</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
How do Latin American States Engage with Responsibility to Protect Norms? A Typology of Positions
Original language description
Within the discourse surrounding the Responsibility to Protect (R2P), scholars have typically categorized the stakeholders as either proponents or staunch detractors, commonly referring to them as R2P 'champions' and 'anti-preneurs,' respectively. However, there is a significant gap in the existing research devoted to comprehending the nuanced positions adopted by states that fall within the spectrum between these two extremes. This article offers a comprehensive exploration of Latin American states' stances concerning R2P norms and provides a typology based on their level of engagement with and degree of support for R2P norms. While certain states overtly contest the legitimacy of R2P, perceiving it as a pretext for external intervention, others challenge existing perceptions of how R2P should be practically implemented. To understand these diverse perspectives, the article differentiates contestation of the R2P norms themselves from contestation of the implementation mechanisms. Through an empirical analysis, it explores various Latin American countries' perspectives on R2P from 2005 to 2023, highlighting their proposals like the Brazilian Responsibility while Protecting, as well as Costa Rica and Mexico's contributions to the Responsibility Not to Veto initiatives. By unraveling the complexities of R2P contestation in Latin America, this article expands our understanding of how diverse regional perspectives shape and inf luence the advancement of R2P norms.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50601 - Political science
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2023
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Czech Journal of International Relations
ISSN
2788-2985
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
58
Issue of the periodical within the volume
3
Country of publishing house
CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC
Number of pages
30
Pages from-to
43-72
UT code for WoS article
001130649200009
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85180255225