Inconsistencies between Libya and Syria?: Pragmatic revisionism and the responsibility to protect
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F48546054%3A_____%2F16%3AN0000131" target="_blank" >RIV/48546054:_____/16:N0000131 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/26482789:_____/16:N0000094
Result on the web
<a href="http://www.cejiss.org/issue-detail/inconsistencies-between-libya-and-syria-pragmatic-revisionism-and-the-responsibility-to-protect" target="_blank" >http://www.cejiss.org/issue-detail/inconsistencies-between-libya-and-syria-pragmatic-revisionism-and-the-responsibility-to-protect</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Inconsistencies between Libya and Syria?: Pragmatic revisionism and the responsibility to protect
Original language description
The on-going debate on the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) concept revolves around its problematic and inconsistent implementation, particularly while comparing the military intervention to protect civilians in Libya (2011) and the inadequate response to the Syrian crisis. The article traces the development of the R2P discourse in the context of key cases, which fundamentally shaped the interpretation of legitimate conditions for humanitarian military intervention. In contrast to the liberal universalist approach, which would understand the R2P as an emerging norm indicating progressive support of liberal values, the analytical framework is based on pragmatic global ethics. In this perspective, the changing perception of normative concepts according to practical politics results inevitably in discursive shifts regarding the R2P operationalization and implementation. Therefore, hesitations over Syria do not reflect the failure of R2P; the crisis rather demonstrates continuous pragmatic revisionism of its normative foundations.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
AD - Political sciences
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/GP13-31540P" target="_blank" >GP13-31540P: Implication of the Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect - The Case of Libya and Syria</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2016
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Central European Journal of International and Security Studies
ISSN
1802-548X
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
10
Issue of the periodical within the volume
2
Country of publishing house
CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC
Number of pages
23
Pages from-to
10-32
UT code for WoS article
—
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85013031180