All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Inconsistencies between Libya and Syria?: Pragmatic revisionism and the responsibility to protect

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F48546054%3A_____%2F16%3AN0000131" target="_blank" >RIV/48546054:_____/16:N0000131 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/26482789:_____/16:N0000094

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://www.cejiss.org/issue-detail/inconsistencies-between-libya-and-syria-pragmatic-revisionism-and-the-responsibility-to-protect" target="_blank" >http://www.cejiss.org/issue-detail/inconsistencies-between-libya-and-syria-pragmatic-revisionism-and-the-responsibility-to-protect</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Inconsistencies between Libya and Syria?: Pragmatic revisionism and the responsibility to protect

  • Original language description

    The on-going debate on the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) concept revolves around its problematic and inconsistent implementation, particularly while comparing the military intervention to protect civilians in Libya (2011) and the inadequate response to the Syrian crisis. The article traces the development of the R2P discourse in the context of key cases, which fundamentally shaped the interpretation of legitimate conditions for humanitarian military intervention. In contrast to the liberal universalist approach, which would understand the R2P as an emerging norm indicating progressive support of liberal values, the analytical framework is based on pragmatic global ethics. In this perspective, the changing perception of normative concepts according to practical politics results inevitably in discursive shifts regarding the R2P operationalization and implementation. Therefore, hesitations over Syria do not reflect the failure of R2P; the crisis rather demonstrates continuous pragmatic revisionism of its normative foundations.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    AD - Political sciences

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GP13-31540P" target="_blank" >GP13-31540P: Implication of the Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect - The Case of Libya and Syria</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2016

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Central European Journal of International and Security Studies

  • ISSN

    1802-548X

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    10

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    2

  • Country of publishing house

    CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC

  • Number of pages

    23

  • Pages from-to

    10-32

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85013031180