All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

THE IMPACT OF SPACER DESIGN ON ELECTRODIALYSIS PROCESS

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F28676092%3A_____%2F17%3AN0000043" target="_blank" >RIV/28676092:_____/17:N0000043 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    THE IMPACT OF SPACER DESIGN ON ELECTRODIALYSIS PROCESS

  • Original language description

    Efficiency is very important factor for each technological process. Electrodialysis efficiency is influenced not only by ion-exchange membrane performance, but also by design of spacer, its type of the flow distributor, spacer material and the conditions of process. The membrane spacer influences the flow regime and so minimizes laminar flow, distributes the feed so it maximizes use of active membrane area and insures good tightness of the membrane stack. Due to different mechanical properties of different types of ion-exchange membranes, spacer must be designed according to them. The only way to find if the spacer suits the ion-exchange membrane is to perform different experiments and compare the results. In this work two types of membranes and four types of spacers are tested and results are compared to show, how much different spacers and ion-exchange membranes influence the electrodialysis process. The flow distributor influence pressure drop and internal leakage the most. Spacers with net flow distributors had the lowest volume of internal leakage, 50 ml.h-1 for spacer with net distributor vs. 126 ml.h-1 for spacer with narrow channels distributor. On the mass flux, net used in active area of spacer had the greatest impact. When PP net was used mass flux was the highest for both membranes. Mass flux for IM LT membranes was 0.301 kg.m-2.h-1 when spacer with PP net was used, on the contrary when spacer with PE net was used, mass flux was only 0.256 kg.m-2.h-1.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    20402 - Chemical process engineering

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/LO1418" target="_blank" >LO1418: Progressive development of the Membrane Innovation Centre</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2017

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    Workshop of Students’ Presentations 2017, Membranes and Membrane Processes

  • ISBN

    978-80-906831-0-5

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

  • Number of pages

    11

  • Pages from-to

  • Publisher name

    Czech Membrane Platform

  • Place of publication

    Česká Lípa

  • Event location

    Stráž pod Ralskem

  • Event date

    Oct 18, 2017

  • Type of event by nationality

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • UT code for WoS article