All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Alternative voting, alternative outcomes: 2018 Presidential election in the Czech Republic

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F44555601%3A13510%2F20%3A43895684" target="_blank" >RIV/44555601:13510/20:43895684 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://www.ccr-munich.de/publications/MSSR/2020_3/6.Oresky+Cech%20-Alternative%20Voting-FINAL.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.ccr-munich.de/publications/MSSR/2020_3/6.Oresky+Cech%20-Alternative%20Voting-FINAL.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Alternative voting, alternative outcomes: 2018 Presidential election in the Czech Republic

  • Original language description

    In this paper, the official two-round system is compared to the D21- Janeček method, using representative data collected during the 2018 presidential election in the Czech Republic. Under the D21-Janeček method, voters were allowed to cast up to three plus votes, with the option of casting one minus vote for the nine presidential candidates. Because of the systematically capped multiple votes, the outcome of the Janeček method differed significantly from the actual election. Additional votes provided more information about voters&apos; preferences and candidates&apos; profiles. Here it showed that the Janeček method favours inclusive candidates who are able to attract the support from voters of other candidates, and disadvantages polarising candidates. Furthermore, the overlap of plus and minus votes reveals which candidates are most hurt by the splitting of votes under plurality voting. A relatively large overlap of plus votes between the main two contenders also suggests that the differences between them were not as big as was presented by the media.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>ost</sub> - Miscellaneous article in a specialist periodical

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50601 - Political science

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2020

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    The Munich Social Science Review (MSSR)

  • ISSN

    0170-2521

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    3

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    2020

  • Country of publishing house

    DE - GERMANY

  • Number of pages

    27

  • Pages from-to

    113-139

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database