All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Contestation over Truth Regimes: Russia, China and the US digital diplomacy on the Russian invasion of Ukraine

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F48546054%3A_____%2F25%3AN0000016" target="_blank" >RIV/48546054:_____/25:N0000016 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://ams.overcastcdn.com/documents/RECLAIM_Contestation_over_Truth_Regimes.pdf" target="_blank" >https://ams.overcastcdn.com/documents/RECLAIM_Contestation_over_Truth_Regimes.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Contestation over Truth Regimes: Russia, China and the US digital diplomacy on the Russian invasion of Ukraine

  • Original language description

    The report explores digital diplomacy campaigns conducted by three foreign powers (China, Russia, and in comparison, The United States) in selected EU member states. It sheds light on how the first two try to achieve a specific external impact – severing foreign populations’ links to the regimes of truth that constitute their states’ economies of power, including through strategic disinformation and propaganda efforts. In so doing, these campaigns aim to increase ontological and epistemological insecurity, creating a crisis of belonging, and knowledge production and transfer. They may reach this goal by spreading positive narratives about themselves (identity affirmation), by disseminating a particular worldview (truth construction); but also by challenging the existing regimes of truth (truth contestation). Subsequently, we compare their strategies with that of the United States. Empirically, the paper focuses on a particular ‘controversy’ – Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and its treatment in the tweets produced by diplomatic missions in the EU of the three foreign powers. Methodologically, the study combines quantitative and qualitative approaches, relying in particular on computer-enhanced critical discourse analysis. The report is result of Horizon RECLAIM - Reclaiming Liberal Democracy in Europe, no. 101061330.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    V<sub>souhrn</sub> - Summary research report

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50601 - Political science

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Number of pages

    31

  • Place of publication

    neuveden

  • Publisher/client name

    European Commission

  • Version