The Impartiality of Judge and the principle of presumption of Innocence in the light of recent ECtHR Case Law
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F49777513%3A23320%2F22%3A43967191" target="_blank" >RIV/49777513:23320/22:43967191 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://rozkotova.cld.bz/CYIL-vol-13-2022/144/" target="_blank" >https://rozkotova.cld.bz/CYIL-vol-13-2022/144/</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
The Impartiality of Judge and the principle of presumption of Innocence in the light of recent ECtHR Case Law
Original language description
Th is study takes a closer look at the principles of impartiality of judges and the principle of presumption of innocence on the background of the recent case law of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter referred to as the ECtHR”). Specifi cally, it is a detailed analysis of the judgment in the case known as Mucha v. Slovakia,1 where, in the proceedings preceding that judgment, the ECtHR found a violation of Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter referred to as the “ECHR”) in relation to the complainant, who had been sentenced to a long term of imprisonment by the same court (a Chamber of the national court) which had previously approved a plea bargain with the other accomplices of the complainant. In the ECtHR’s view, the convictions which pproved the plea bargains with all the complainant’s co-perpetrators raised serious doubts about the impartiality of the court (i.e., the decision-making Chamber). Th e ECtHR was thus partly inspired by the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, which raises the question whether this judgment will be confi rmed by the case-law of other European courts or not. Th is fact could result in a future change of the criminal procedure rules regarding the exclusion of judges from deciding in similar cases. Th e analysis of such a judgment is important not only for Slovak and Czech legal doctrine and practice, which are very similar for historical reasons, but also for the rules of criminal procedure in other countries of the Council of Europe and the European Union. At the same time, thanks to the judgment which is subject to the analysis, it is necessary to point out the prevailing mutual respect between the two European courts in terms of the results of their decisionmaking activities.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50501 - Law
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2022
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Czech Yearbook of Public & Private International Law
ISSN
1805-0565
e-ISSN
1805-0999
Volume of the periodical
13
Issue of the periodical within the volume
13
Country of publishing house
CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC
Number of pages
15
Pages from-to
144-158
UT code for WoS article
—
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85168489146