All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

The Impartiality of Judge and the principle of presumption of Innocence in the light of recent ECtHR Case Law

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F49777513%3A23320%2F22%3A43967191" target="_blank" >RIV/49777513:23320/22:43967191 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://rozkotova.cld.bz/CYIL-vol-13-2022/144/" target="_blank" >https://rozkotova.cld.bz/CYIL-vol-13-2022/144/</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    The Impartiality of Judge and the principle of presumption of Innocence in the light of recent ECtHR Case Law

  • Original language description

    Th is study takes a closer look at the principles of impartiality of judges and the principle of presumption of innocence on the background of the recent case law of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter referred to as the ECtHR”). Specifi cally, it is a detailed analysis of the judgment in the case known as Mucha v. Slovakia,1 where, in the proceedings preceding that judgment, the ECtHR found a violation of Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter referred to as the “ECHR”) in relation to the complainant, who had been sentenced to a long term of imprisonment by the same court (a Chamber of the national court) which had previously approved a plea bargain with the other accomplices of the complainant. In the ECtHR’s view, the convictions which pproved the plea bargains with all the complainant’s co-perpetrators raised serious doubts about the impartiality of the court (i.e., the decision-making Chamber). Th e ECtHR was thus partly inspired by the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, which raises the question whether this judgment will be confi rmed by the case-law of other European courts or not. Th is fact could result in a future change of the criminal procedure rules regarding the exclusion of judges from deciding in similar cases. Th e analysis of such a judgment is important not only for Slovak and Czech legal doctrine and practice, which are very similar for historical reasons, but also for the rules of criminal procedure in other countries of the Council of Europe and the European Union. At the same time, thanks to the judgment which is subject to the analysis, it is necessary to point out the prevailing mutual respect between the two European courts in terms of the results of their decisionmaking activities.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50501 - Law

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2022

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Czech Yearbook of Public &amp; Private International Law

  • ISSN

    1805-0565

  • e-ISSN

    1805-0999

  • Volume of the periodical

    13

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    13

  • Country of publishing house

    CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC

  • Number of pages

    15

  • Pages from-to

    144-158

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85168489146