Patient misidentification in nursing care
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12110%2F15%3A43889539" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12110/15:43889539 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Patient misidentification in nursing care
Original language description
The goal of the study was to assess the opinions of nurses regarding patient safety associated with patient misidentification. The investigation was focused on actual patient misidentification as well as loss of patient materials (e.g., blood samples, X-rays, etc.). These are problems often associated with patient identification methods and/or confusing patients with the same surname assigned to the same ward. The risks of misidentification incidents pose a considerable threat to patient health especially when the confusion extends to the operating room. Our objective was to identify the potential causes of patient misidentification and offers solutions to correct the issue. A survey as part of a sociological investigation was carried out through the use of questionnaires. The sample consisted of 772 registered nurses. The potential for patient misidentification (PM) was described as negligible by 73.8% of respondents. Only 9.1% of nurses admitted problems associated with patient misidentification. Respondents reported that the greatest potential for patient misidentification was associated with patients having the same surname staying on the same ward. An absolute majority of nurses responded that patient identification wristbands were the most frequently used method to prevent PM. Over 90% (90.6%) of nurses reported that patient ID wristbands were used for all patients. Almost 80% (77.4%) reported the use of positive verbal identification in addition to ID wrist bands. Respondents reported (76.2%) that the most frequently used method to avoid PM in the operating room involved a review of patient documentation. Almost the same number of repondents (74.1%) reported the use of verbal confirmation as a method to avoid PM. Another mechanism included verification of the surgical procedure. ID wristbands and completion of an 'identification protocol' rank among other options mentioned most frequently by respondents.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
AQ - Safety and health protection, safety in operating machinery
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/NT14133" target="_blank" >NT14133: Improvement of nursing care safety</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2015
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Neuroendocrinology Letters
ISSN
0172-780X
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
36
Issue of the periodical within the volume
Suppl. 2
Country of publishing house
SE - SWEDEN
Number of pages
6
Pages from-to
17-22
UT code for WoS article
000369425900003
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—