All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Influence of Probiotic Strains Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Enterococcus on the Health Status and Weight Gain of Calves, and the Utilization of Nitrogenous Compounds

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12220%2F22%3A43906107" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12220/22:43906107 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/11/9/1273" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/11/9/1273</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11091273" target="_blank" >10.3390/antibiotics11091273</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Influence of Probiotic Strains Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Enterococcus on the Health Status and Weight Gain of Calves, and the Utilization of Nitrogenous Compounds

  • Original language description

    The aim of this study was to monitor the effect of Bifidobacterium bifidum (BB) and the combination of Lactobacillus sporogenes, Enterococcus faecium, and Bifidobacterium bifidum (LEB) on the health status and weight gain of calves, and the utilisation of nitrogenous substances. The experiment was performed in the period from April 2020 to September 2020. A total of 90 Holstein heifers, which were one to 56 days old, were used as experimental animals. Differences in live weight gain were significant if we compared the LEB vs. BB group and the LEB vs. C, the control group (86.23 +/- 5.49 kg vs. 84.72 +/- 6.22 kg, p &lt; 0.05; 86.23 +/- 5.49 kg vs. 82.86 +/- 5.35 kg, p &lt; 0.01). Considering the live weight gain, group BB was heavier than group C only (84.72 +/- 6.22 kg vs. 82.86 +/- 5.35 kg, p &lt; 0.05). An effect on reducing the incidence and duration of diarrheal diseases was not demonstrated in this study (p = 0.1957). The administration of feed additives had no statistically significant effect on the amount of N excreted in the feces. The values of hematological and biochemical parameters were unaffected except for the first sampling of urea. Other blood parameters were not affected by the addition of probiotic feed additives. The bacterial populations in the feces 5 days and 56 days after birth were not affected by the inclusion of feed additives.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    40301 - Veterinary science

Result continuities

  • Project

    Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2022

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Antibiotics

  • ISSN

    2079-6382

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    11

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    9

  • Country of publishing house

    CH - SWITZERLAND

  • Number of pages

    11

  • Pages from-to

    nestrankovano

  • UT code for WoS article

    000859370100001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database