All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Closed-form formulas vs. PDE based numerical solution for the FRAP data processing: Theoretical and practical comparison

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12520%2F17%3A43895285" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12520/17:43895285 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/67985807:_____/17:00473666

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898122117300767" target="_blank" >http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898122117300767</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2017.02.010" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.camwa.2017.02.010</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Closed-form formulas vs. PDE based numerical solution for the FRAP data processing: Theoretical and practical comparison

  • Original language description

    Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is a widely used method to analyze (usually using fluorescence microscopy) the mobility of either fluorescently tagged or autofluorescent (e.g., photosynthetic) proteins in living cells. The FRAP method resides in imaging the recovery of fluorescence intensity over time in a region of interest previously bleached by a high-intensity laser pulse. While the basic principles of FRAP are simple and the experimental setup is usually fixed, quantitative FRAP data analysis is not well developed. Different models and numerical procedures are used for the underlying model parameter estimation without knowledge of how robust the methods are, i.e., the parameter inference step is not currently well established. In this paper we rigorously formulate the inverse problem of model parameter estimation (including the sensitivity analysis), making possible the comparison of different FRAP parameter inference methods. Then, in a study on simulated data, we focus on how three different methods for inference influence the error in parameter estimation. We demonstrate both theoretically and empirically that our new method based on a solution of a general initial boundary value problem for the Fick diffusion partial differential equation exhibits less bias and narrower confidence intervals of the estimated diffusion parameter, than two closed formula methods.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10103 - Statistics and probability

Result continuities

  • Project

    Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2017

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Computers &amp; Mathematics with Applications

  • ISSN

    0898-1221

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    73

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    8

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    11

  • Pages from-to

    1673-1683

  • UT code for WoS article

    000400199400003

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85014215071