Using ChatGPT to conduct a literature review

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41110%2F23%3A94540" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41110/23:94540 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08989621.2023.2185514" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08989621.2023.2185514</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2185514" target="_blank" >10.1080/08989621.2023.2185514</a>

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Using ChatGPT to conduct a literature review
Original language description
This paper explores the ethical and practical implications of using ChatGPT, an AI language model, in the research process, specifically in conducting a literature review. The authors argue that it is unethical to use AI services to produce a literature review as the authors of a publication must be held responsible for producing it. They also conducted a test using ChatGPT to generate a list of seminal academic articles in medicine and found that it provided many fake papers, making it difficult to recommend as an aid in the research process. As a result, the authors firmly recommend not using ChatGPT in the research process.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30311 - Medical ethics

Publication year
2023
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)