Comparison of Traditional and Soil Conservation Technology of Cultivation of Maize for Grain
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41310%2F07%3A20155" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41310/07:20155 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Comparison of Traditional and Soil Conservation Technology of Cultivation of Maize for Grain
Original language description
The paper presents the results of field trials that assess influence of various technologies of maize-for-grain cropstand establishment on not only its yield, but as well on labour and fuel consumption, and individual cost components. The field trials have been carried out since the year 2004 in all maize-growing regions of the Czech Republic. Farm businesses are monitored that perform either conventional technology of soil cultivation comprising ploughing or reduced-tillage technology. Te trials showedno significant differences in grain yields between both technologies in question. On the other hand, labour consumption demonstrated highly significant differences, i.e. 56.2 % in favour of reduced-tillage. Significant differences in favour of reduced-tillage technology were proved as well with regard to fuel consumption, and machinery and total costs.
Czech name
Porovnání konvenční a půdoochranné technologie pěstování kukuřice na zrno
Czech description
The paper presents the results of field trials that assess influence of various technologies of maize-for-grain cropstand establishment on not only its yield, but as well on labour and fuel consumption, and individual cost components. The field trials have been carried out since the year 2004 in all maize-growing regions of the Czech Republic. Farm businesses are monitored that perform either conventional technology of soil cultivation comprising ploughing or reduced-tillage technology. Te trials showedno significant differences in grain yields between both technologies in question. On the other hand, labour consumption demonstrated highly significant differences, i.e. 56.2 % in favour of reduced-tillage. Significant differences in favour of reduced-tillage technology were proved as well with regard to fuel consumption, and machinery and total costs.
Classification
Type
D - Article in proceedings
CEP classification
GD - Fertilization, irrigation, soil treatment
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.
Continuities
Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)
Others
Publication year
2007
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Article name in the collection
Trends in Agricultural Engineering 2007
ISBN
978-80-213-1668-3
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
—
Number of pages
4
Pages from-to
418-421
Publisher name
Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
Place of publication
Praha
Event location
Praha
Event date
Sep 12, 2007
Type of event by nationality
WRD - Celosvětová akce
UT code for WoS article
—