Meat Consumption in Transition: The Case of Crisis Region of Iraqi Kurdistan

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41340%2F21%3A85548" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41340/21:85548 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/08974438.2021.1936332" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1080/08974438.2021.1936332</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08974438.2021.1936332" target="_blank" >10.1080/08974438.2021.1936332</a>

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Meat Consumption in Transition: The Case of Crisis Region of Iraqi Kurdistan
Original language description
This study investigates the main drivers of white and red meat consumption in crisis regions based on microeconomic theory, hegemonic masculinity theory, meat paradox theory, and nutrition transition theory. A quantitative questionnaire survey was conducted in Sulaymaniyah city in Iraqi Kurdistan in 2018. Data from 233 respondents were collected. Multifactorial linear regression analysis showed that the main drivers in the consumption of white meat and red meat are similar: higher income and preferences for the taste of white or red meat have a statistically significant, positive effect on meat consumption. Men consume white meat more than women. The consumption of red meat decreases when the respondent is concerned about the fat content of meat and animal welfare awareness does not have a statistically significant effect on the consumption of either type of meat.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
40101 - Agriculture

Publication year
2021
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)