Automated Analysis of Microscopic Images of Isolated Pancreatic Islets
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60461373%3A22340%2F16%3A43901595" target="_blank" >RIV/60461373:22340/16:43901595 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/67985556:_____/16:00465945 RIV/68407700:21230/16:00304584 RIV/00023001:_____/16:00060180
Result on the web
<a href="http://docserver.ingentaconnect.com.ezproxy.vscht.cz/deliver/connect/cog/09636897/v25n12/s5.pdf?expires=1486165890&id=89827820&titleid=5476&accname=Institute+of+Chemical+Technology%2C+Prague&checksum=42223F3A4B4E1B81746F54F2DC1FF32A" target="_blank" >http://docserver.ingentaconnect.com.ezproxy.vscht.cz/deliver/connect/cog/09636897/v25n12/s5.pdf?expires=1486165890&id=89827820&titleid=5476&accname=Institute+of+Chemical+Technology%2C+Prague&checksum=42223F3A4B4E1B81746F54F2DC1FF32A</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3727/096368916X692005" target="_blank" >10.3727/096368916X692005</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Automated Analysis of Microscopic Images of Isolated Pancreatic Islets
Original language description
Clinical islet transplantation programs rely on the capacities of individual centers to quantify isolated islets. Current computer-assisted methods require input from human operators. Here, we describe two machine learning algorithms for islet quantification, the trainable islet algorithm (TIA) and the non-trainable purity algorithm (NPA). These algorithms automatically segment pancreatic islets and exocrine tissue on microscopic images in order to count individual islets and calculate islet volume and purity. References for islet counts and volumes were generated by the fully manual segmentation (FMS) method, which was validated against the internal DNA standard. References for islet purity were generated via the expert visual assessment (EVA) method, which was validated against the FMS method. The TIA is intended to automatically evaluate micrographs of isolated islets from future donors, after being trained on micrographs from a limited number of past donors. Its training ability was first evaluated on 46 images from four donors. The pixel-to-pixel comparison, binary statistics, and islet DNA concentration indicated that the TIA was successfully trained, regardless of the color differences of the original images. Next, the TIA trained on the four donors was validated on an additional 36 images from nine independent donors. The TIA was fast (67 sec/image), correlated very well with the FMS method (R2 = 1.00 and 0.92 for islet volume and islet count, respectively), and had small REs (0.06 and 0.07 for islet volume and islet count, respectively). Validation of the NPA against the EVA method using 70 images from 12 donors revealed that the NPA had a reasonable speed (69 sec/image), an acceptable RE (0.14), and correlated well with the EVA method (R2 = 0.88). Our results demonstrate that a fully automated analysis of clinical-grade micrographs of isolated pancreatic islets is feasible. The algorithms described herein will be freely available as a Fiji platform plugin.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
JD - Use of computers, robotics and its application
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2016
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Cell Transplantation
ISSN
0963-6897
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
25
Issue of the periodical within the volume
12
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
12
Pages from-to
2145-2156
UT code for WoS article
000390183200005
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85007086435