All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Utility of artificial intelligence in radiosurgery for pituitary adenoma: a deep learning-based automated segmentation model and evaluation of its clinical applicability

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61383082%3A_____%2F25%3A00001527" target="_blank" >RIV/61383082:_____/25:00001527 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/68407700:21230/25:00386003 RIV/00216208:11110/25:10500556 RIV/00023884:_____/25:00010046

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40250054/" target="_blank" >https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40250054/</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2024.12.JNS242167" target="_blank" >10.3171/2024.12.JNS242167</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Utility of artificial intelligence in radiosurgery for pituitary adenoma: a deep learning-based automated segmentation model and evaluation of its clinical applicability

  • Original language description

    The objective of this study was to develop a deep learning model for automated pituitary adenoma segmentation in MRI scans for stereotactic radiosurgery planning and to assess its accuracy and efficiency in clinical settings. METHODS An nnU-Net–based model was trained on MRI scans with expert segmentations of 582 patients treated with Leksell Gamma Knife over the course of 12 years. The accuracy of the model was evaluated by a human expert on a separate dataset of 146 previously unseen patients. The primary outcome was the comparison of expert ratings between the predicted segmentations and a control group consisting of original manual segmentations. Secondary outcomes were the influence of tumor volume, previous surgery, previous stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and endocrinological status on expert ratings, performance in a subgroup of nonfunctioning macroadenomas (measuring 1000–4000 mm3) without previous surgery and/or radiosurgery, and influence of using additional MRI modalities as model input and time cost reduction. RESULTS The model achieved Dice similarity coefficients of 82.3%, 63.9%, and 79.6% for tumor, normal gland, and optic nerve, respectively. A human expert rated 20.6% of the segmentations as applicable in treatment planning without any modifications, 52.7% as applicable with minor manual modifications, and 26.7% as inapplicable. The ratings for predicted segmentations were lower than for the control group of original segmentations (p < 0.001). Larger tumor volume, history of a previous radiosurgery, and nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma were associated with better expert ratings (p = 0.005, p = 0.007, and p < 0.001, respectively). In the subgroup without previous surgery, although expert ratings were more favorable, the association did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.074). In the subgroup of noncomplex cases (n = 9), 55.6% of the segmentations were rated as applicable without any manual modifications and no segmentations were rated as inapplicable. Manually improving inaccurate segmentations instead of creating them from scratch led to 53.6% reduction of the time cost (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The results were applicable for treatment planning with either no or minor manual modifications, demonstrating a significant increase in the efficiency of the planning process. The predicted segmentations can be loaded into the planning software used in clinical practice for treatment planning. The authors discuss some considerations of the clinical utility of the automated segmentation models, as well as their integration within established clinical workflows, and outline directions for future research.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30103 - Neurosciences (including psychophysiology)

Result continuities

  • Project

    Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Journal of Neurosurgery

  • ISSN

    0022-3085

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    143

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    2

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    10

  • Pages from-to

    413-422

  • UT code for WoS article

    001561445300001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database