All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Cytotoxic effect of Aeruginosin-865, capsaicin, and resveratrol on mouse cell lines of different origin

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61388971%3A_____%2F21%3A00552400" target="_blank" >RIV/61388971:_____/21:00552400 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/62157124:16170/21:43879140

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://actavet.vfu.cz/90/3/0307/" target="_blank" >https://actavet.vfu.cz/90/3/0307/</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2754/avb202190030307" target="_blank" >10.2754/avb202190030307</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Cytotoxic effect of Aeruginosin-865, capsaicin, and resveratrol on mouse cell lines of different origin

  • Original language description

    The aim of the study was to compare the effects of three natural bioactive compounds (and their combinations) on normal vs. tumour-transformed mouse cells. The cytotoxic effect of Aeruginosin-865 (Aer), capsaicin (Cap), resveratrol (Res) and their combinations was evaluated on normal hepatocytes (AML) and tumour cells derived from livers (Hepa) and kidneys (Renca). Various concentrations from 25 to 200 mu M of tested substances were used. Only the Aer + Res combination and a low concentration of Res had a significant cytotoxic effect on Hepa and Renca and no significant cytotoxic effect on AML. Cap had a significant cytotoxic effect on all tested cell lines, but tumour-derived cells showed higher resistance than AML. A significantly increased cytotoxicity was found in the combination of Cap + Res compared to each substance alone. All types of cells showed similar sensitivity to the cytotoxic effect of Cap + Res. Because of a possible hepatotoxic effect, we recommend further investigations into side-effects of Cap + Res. No cytotoxic effect was described in Cap + Aer or in Aer alone. Only substances with a significant cytotoxic effect on tumour cells and no cytotoxic effect on normal cells can be potentially used in anticancer treatment. According to the results, only Res or the combination of Aer + Res can be recommended for further evaluation in the process of new anticancer drug development. The potential hepatotoxic effect of Cap + Res can significantly limit the utilisation of these substances in anticancer treatment.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    40301 - Veterinary science

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Acta veterinaria Brno

  • ISSN

    0001-7213

  • e-ISSN

    1801-7576

  • Volume of the periodical

    90

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    3

  • Country of publishing house

    CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC

  • Number of pages

    8

  • Pages from-to

    307-314

  • UT code for WoS article

    000735992600008

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85117239204