Manure amendments and fungistasis, and relation with protection of wheat from Fusarium graminearum

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61388971%3A_____%2F24%3A00587636" target="_blank" >RIV/61388971:_____/24:00587636 - isvavai.cz</a>

Result on the web

<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929139324002373?via%3Dihub" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929139324002373?via%3Dihub</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105506" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105506</a>

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

Manure amendments and fungistasis, and relation with protection of wheat from Fusarium graminearum

Original language description

Anotace v jazyku práce nCertain soils promote crop health because they are pathogen-suppressive (i.e., fungistatic) or disease-suppressive, but the effect of soil management on these properties is not fully understood. Here, we tested the hypothesis that manure could favor fungistasis by screening 26 manured or non-manured wheat fields from Serbia for their ability to control survival/growth of the fungal plant pathogen Fusarium graminearum Fg1. Quantitative PCR showed that the pathogen grew after inoculation in all 26 autoclaved soils. In absence of autoclaving, the pathogen was stable or grew in 16 soils (37 % manured) but declined in the 10 others (70 % manured). For most soils, there was no significant link between soil chemistry and fungistasis, except with Mionica in western/central Serbia. Mionica soils MI2 and MI3, which had received manure, exhibited higher levels of organic matter and potassium compared with soils MI4 and MI5, which had not received manure and were non-fungistatic. Using Mionica soils, we then tested the hypothesis that fungistatic (manured) soils rather than non-fungistatic (nonmanured) soils would protect wheat from F. graminearum disease. Indeed, fungistatic soils were suppressive to wheat damping-off. Non-fungistatic soil MI4 was conducive, as expected, but non-fungistatic soil MI5 turned out to be suppressive. Metabarcoding showed that the structure of prokaryotic and fungal rhizosphere communities depended mostly on field location, with a significant effect of F. graminearum inoculation. In conclusion, our findings show that certain farming practices (here, manure amendments) may promote soil fungistasis towards F. graminearum. However, both fungistatic and non-fungistatic soils can be suppressive to F. graminearum disease in wheat, and their differences in rhizosphere microbiota suggest different phytoprotection mechanisms.n

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_imp - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

10606 - Microbiology

Project

<a href="/en/project/8X20052" target="_blank" >8X20052: Analysis of soils suppressive to crop diseases in different agronomic contexts</a><br>

Continuities

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year

2024

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

Applied Soil Ecology

ISSN

0929-1393

e-ISSN

1873-0272

Volume of the periodical

201

Issue of the periodical within the volume

September 2024

Country of publishing house

NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS

Number of pages

15

Pages from-to

105506

UT code for WoS article

001268434300001

EID of the result in the Scopus database

2-s2.0-85198397858