Resonance tube or lax vox?
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61388998%3A_____%2F15%3A00447599" target="_blank" >RIV/61388998:_____/15:00447599 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Resonance tube or lax vox?
Original language description
Voice training and therapy utilize phonation into tubes, the outer end either in the air or immersed in water. This study compares (1) flow resistance of resonance tube and lax vox tube when submerged 2 cm and 10 cm in water, and (2) phonation into resonance tube and lax vox tube with the outer end immersed 2 cm and 10 cm in water in a bowl. Flow resistance was slightly lower with lax vox tube than with resonance tube, and slightly lower for smaller immersion angles. Flow resistance was higher for lowerflow values corresponding to soft phonation. The only significant difference was that contact quotient was somewhat lower for softer phonation into lax vox tube immersed 2 cm in water. It seems that the differences in length, material and inner diameterof resonance tube and lax vox tube have rather little effect on phonation. Due to the small number of subjects (three males and three females) the results are preliminary.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
O - Miscellaneous
CEP classification
BI - Acoustics and oscillation
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/GAP101%2F12%2F1306" target="_blank" >GAP101/12/1306: Biomechanical modeling of human voice production - way to artificial vocal folds</a><br>
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2015
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů