All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Resonance Tube or Lax Vox?

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61388998%3A_____%2F17%3A00469140" target="_blank" >RIV/61388998:_____/17:00469140 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.10.024" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.10.024</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.10.024" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.10.024</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Resonance Tube or Lax Vox?

  • Original language description

    Objective. This study compares the flow resistance of Resonance tube (RT) and Lax Vox tube (LVT) when submerged 2 cm and 10 cm in water, as well as phonation into the tubes in these conditions.nMethods. In the in vitro experiment, the air pressure for flow rates of 60-600 mL/s was measured at the tube inlet, when the outer end of the tube was submerged 2 cm and 10 cm below water surface in 30 degrees, 45 degrees, and 90 degrees angle. In the in vivo experiment, 14 subjects phonated in habitual loudness and loudly into both tubes, with the outer end 2 cm and 10 cm in water. RT was immersed in a 45 degrees angle and LVT in a 90 degrees angle in water. Oral pressure, contact quotient from electroglottographic signal, and sound pressure level were studied. Sensations during phonation were reported in an interview.nResults. Flow resistance was slightly lower with LVT than with RT, and slightly lower for smaller immersion angles. In habitual loudness, transglottic pressure and frequency of oral pressure variation were lower for LVT phonation and amplitude of oral pressure variation was higher for LVT 2 cm in water. Some subjects preferred RT, whereas others preferred LVT or reported no differences between them.nConclusions. The tubes differed slightly in flow resistance. Higher oral pressure oscillation with LVT 2 cm in water may offer stronger massage effect on vocal folds.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10307 - Acoustics

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA16-01246S" target="_blank" >GA16-01246S: Computational and experimental modelling of self-induced vibrations of vocal folds and influence of their impairments on human voice</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2017

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Journal of Voice

  • ISSN

    0892-1997

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    31

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    4

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    8

  • Pages from-to

    430-437

  • UT code for WoS article

    000406147000006

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85008430178