Toxicity of internal mammary irradiation in breast cancer. Are concerns still justified in times of modern treatment techniques?
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61389005%3A_____%2F20%3A00531056" target="_blank" >RIV/61389005:_____/20:00531056 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2020.1787509" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2020.1787509</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2020.1787509" target="_blank" >10.1080/0284186X.2020.1787509</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Toxicity of internal mammary irradiation in breast cancer. Are concerns still justified in times of modern treatment techniques?
Original language description
Background:The purpose of this study was to estimate the additional risk of side effects attributed to internal mammary node irradiation (IMNI) as part of regional lymph node irradiation (RNI) in breast cancer patients and to compare it with estimated overall survival (OS) benefit from IMNI. Material and methods:Treatment plans (n = 80) with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) were calculated for 20 patients (4 plans per patient) with left-sided breast cancer from the prospective GATTUM trial in free breathing (FB) and in deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH). We assessed doses to organs at risk ((OARs) lung, contralateral breast and heart) during RNI with and without additional IMNI. Based on the OAR doses, the additional absolute risks of 10-year cardiac mortality, pneumonitis, and secondary lung and breast cancer were estimated using normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) and risk models assuming different age and risk levels. Results:IMNI notably increased the mean OAR doses. The mean heart dose increased upon IMNI by 0.2-3.4 Gy (median: 1.9 Gy) in FB and 0.0-1.5 Gy (median 0.4 Gy) in DIBH. However, the estimated absolute additional 10-year cardiac mortality caused by IMNI was <0.5% for all patients studied except 70-year-old high risk patients (0.2-2.4% in FB and 0.0-1.1% in DIBH). In comparison to this, the published oncological benefit of IMNI ranges between 3.3% and 4.7%. The estimated additional 10-year risk of secondary cancer of the lung or contralateral breast ranged from 0-1.5% and 0-2.8%, respectively, depending on age and risk levels. IMNI increased the pneumonitis risk in all groups (0-2.2%). Conclusion:According to our analyses, the published oncological benefit of IMNI outweighs the estimated risk of cardiac mortality even in case of (e.g., cardiac) risk factors during VMAT. The estimated risk of secondary cancer or pneumonitis attributed to IMNI is low. DIBH reduces the estimated additional risk of IMNI even further and should be strongly considered especially in patients with a high baseline risk.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30224 - Radiology, nuclear medicine and medical imaging
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2020
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Acta Oncologica
ISSN
0284-186X
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
59
Issue of the periodical within the volume
10
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
9
Pages from-to
1201-1209
UT code for WoS article
000546296100001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85087635143