All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Optimising Tubular Solar Still Performance with Gamma Aluminium Nanocoatings: Experimental Insights on Yield, Efficiency, and Economic Viability

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61389021%3A_____%2F25%3A00646306" target="_blank" >RIV/61389021:_____/25:00646306 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/60461373:22320/25:43932889

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/13/8/2413" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/13/8/2413</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pr13082413" target="_blank" >10.3390/pr13082413</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Optimising Tubular Solar Still Performance with Gamma Aluminium Nanocoatings: Experimental Insights on Yield, Efficiency, and Economic Viability

  • Original language description

    This study evaluates the performance of tubular solar stills coated with gamma aluminium nanocoatings at concentrations of 5%, 10%, and 15%, compared to a conventional tubular solar still. This is the first experimental study to apply gamma aluminium nanocoatings on tubular solar stills (TSS). The stills were tested for three days, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., under consistent conditions with varying water depths of 1 cm, 2 cm, and 3 cm. The results indicated that the 5% nanocoating achieved the highest water yield, producing 2.571 L/m2 with a 1 cm water depth. The 10% coating produced 2.514 L/m2, while the conventional solar still generated 2.286 L/m2. Thermal efficiency was highest on Day 1 for the 5% concentration, reaching 60.9%, followed by 10% concentration at 59.1%, while the 15% concentration showed the lowest efficiency at 33.8%. In terms of cost-effectiveness, the 5% concentration was the most economical, with the lowest cost per litre (CPL) of USD 0.10 and a payback period of 3.03 months. The 10% concentration had a CPL of USD 0.11 and a payback period of 3.33 months, while the 15% concentration had the highest CPL at USD 0.19 and the longest payback period of 5.63 months. Overall, the 5% concentration offered the best balance of water yield, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. This research highlights γ-Al2O3 as an innovative, cost-effective material for solar distillation, paving the way for sustainable freshwater production.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    20506 - Coating and films

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Processes

  • ISSN

    2227-9717

  • e-ISSN

    2227-9717

  • Volume of the periodical

    13

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    8

  • Country of publishing house

    CH - SWITZERLAND

  • Number of pages

    13

  • Pages from-to

    2413

  • UT code for WoS article

    001557604900001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-105014284808