Expectations, disappointments and individual responses: imbalances in multilevel flood risk governance revealed by public survey
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17310%2F20%3AA2101ZTB" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17310/20:A2101ZTB - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/44555601:13440/20:43895439 RIV/44555601:13510/20:43895439
Result on the web
<a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jfr3.12615" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jfr3.12615</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12615" target="_blank" >10.1111/jfr3.12615</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Expectations, disappointments and individual responses: imbalances in multilevel flood risk governance revealed by public survey
Original language description
The recent paradigm shift toward multilevel flood risk management (FRM) has raised fundamental discussions about the potential of different entities to undertake specific FRM measures, as well as about the multiple effects of their efforts on other governance levels. Among the key questions being addressed are those related to the balance and possible inverse proportions between governmental efforts and motivation for individual action. In this paper, we use the results of a flood perception survey among individuals in two flood-prone Czech municipalities to reveal the discrepancies between the expectations of responsibility sharing and the actual willingness for individual flood risk reduction. While the results indicate strong expectations of the responsibilities of the governmental bodies for FRM, the respondents also expressed low confidence in completed FRM measures and strong self-reliance during floods and recovery. The willingness for individual FRM action is mostly limited to private insurance, whereas further long-term instruments are not favoured. The analysis also revealed differences between the two study areas, which indicates that, despite the current country-wide FRM policies based on the EU Floods Directive, the contextual factors and differential perception of scales of FRM measures and catchment complexity influence expectations of responsibility sharing
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50704 - Environmental sciences (social aspects)
Result continuities
Project
Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2020
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Journal of Flood Risk Management
ISSN
1753-318X
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
e12615
Issue of the periodical within the volume
04/2020
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
14
Pages from-to
—
UT code for WoS article
000527035800001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85083670947