Microlearning in the Education of Future Teachers: Monitoring and Evaluating Students’ Activity in a Microlearning Course
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17450%2F23%3AA2402IS4" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17450/23:A2402IS4 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejel/issue/view/257" target="_blank" >https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejel/issue/view/257</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.34190/ejel.21.1.2623" target="_blank" >10.34190/ejel.21.1.2623</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Microlearning in the Education of Future Teachers: Monitoring and Evaluating Students’ Activity in a Microlearning Course
Original language description
The article presents the conclusions of a research carried out at the Faculty of Education of the University of Ostrava. The aim of the research was to find out whether there are differences in approaches of studying a microlearning course. A microlearning course focused on teaching future teachers was created for the purposes of the research. The aim of the course was to present to students the possibilities of using digital technologies in the educational process. The research was conducted in the winter semester of the academic year 2021/2022. A total of 378 students participated in the study in the first phase (precourse survey) and subsequently 156 students in the second phase (analysis of course participants' behavior). Student activity was monitored during the study through learning analytics tools. Time of study, the number of realized events, the number of registrations, etc. were recorded for each student with these tools. The obtained data were analyzed using cluster analysis. Total of six different approaches that led to the successful completion of a microlearning course were described based on this analysis. The approaches can be used to describe a successful strategy to go through a microlearning course including the extreme ones. An interesting fact is that the choice of strategy is not influenced by the student's gender. The only parameter where significant differences were found was the number of days to finish the microlearning course. In addition, the article describes the behavior of students in the course, the types of learning materials, devices from which they logged in the course and list of the most used course components. This part of the data was recorded via heatmaps. A detailed description of students' study strategies within microlearning courses can improve the effectiveness of microlearning also in connection with the personalized passage and thus improve the quality and efficiency of the educational process of future teachers.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50300 - Education
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Others
Publication year
2023
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
The Electronic Journal of e-Learning
ISSN
1479-4403
e-ISSN
1479-4403
Volume of the periodical
—
Issue of the periodical within the volume
1
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
13
Pages from-to
13-25
UT code for WoS article
000926506700002
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85147265976