Measurement System Analyses - Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility Methods
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27230%2F18%3A10239405" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27230/18:10239405 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/61989100:27360/18:10239405
Result on the web
<a href="http://apps.webofknowledge.com/full_record.do?product=WOS&search_mode=GeneralSearch&qid=1&SID=F58vY65LzVWysPgwW34&page=1&doc=4" target="_blank" >http://apps.webofknowledge.com/full_record.do?product=WOS&search_mode=GeneralSearch&qid=1&SID=F58vY65LzVWysPgwW34&page=1&doc=4</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/msr-2018-0004" target="_blank" >10.1515/msr-2018-0004</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Measurement System Analyses - Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility Methods
Original language description
The submitted article focuses on a detailed explanation of the average and range method (Automotive Industry Action Group, Measurement System Analysis approach) and of the honest Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility method (Evaluating the Measurement Process approach). The measured data (thickness of plastic parts) were evaluated by both methods and their results were compared on the basis of numerical evaluation. Both methods were additionally compared and their advantages and disadvantages were discussed. One difference between both methods is the calculation of variation components. The AIAG method calculates the variation components based on standard deviation (then a sum of variation components does not give 100 %) and the honest GRR study calculates the variation components based on variance, where the sum of all variation components (part to part variation, EV & AV) gives the total variation of 100 %. Acceptance of both methods among the professional society, future use, and acceptance by manufacturing industry were also discussed. Nowadays, the AIAG is the leading method in the industry.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
20301 - Mechanical engineering
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2018
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Measurement Science Review
ISSN
1335-8871
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
18
Issue of the periodical within the volume
1
Country of publishing house
PL - POLAND
Number of pages
8
Pages from-to
20-27
UT code for WoS article
000429477000004
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85043764685