A Comparative Analysis on Prediction Performance of Regression Models during Machining of Composite Materials

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27230%2F21%3A10248233" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27230/21:10248233 - isvavai.cz</a>

Result on the web

<a href="http://apps.webofknowledge.com/full_record.do?product=WOS&search_mode=GeneralSearch&qid=2&SID=F2WS4UeMdGkcrCxv59t&page=1&doc=3" target="_blank" >http://apps.webofknowledge.com/full_record.do?product=WOS&search_mode=GeneralSearch&qid=2&SID=F2WS4UeMdGkcrCxv59t&page=1&doc=3</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14216689" target="_blank" >10.3390/ma14216689</a>

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

A Comparative Analysis on Prediction Performance of Regression Models during Machining of Composite Materials

Original language description

Modeling the interrelationships between the input parameters and outputs (responses) in any machining processes is essential to understand the process behavior and material removal mechanism. The developed models can also act as effective prediction tools in envisaging the tentative values of the responses for given sets of input parameters. In this paper, the application potentialities of nine different regression models, such as linear regression (LR), polynomial regression (PR), support vector regression (SVR), principal component regression (PCR), quantile regression, median regression, ridge regression, lasso regression and elastic net regression are explored in accurately predicting response values during turning and drilling operations of composite materials. Their prediction performance is also contrasted using four statistical metrics, i.e., mean absolute percentage error, root mean squared percentage error, root mean squared logarithmic error and root relative squared error. Based on the lower values of those metrics and Friedman rank and aligned rank tests, SVR emerges out as the best performing model, whereas the prediction performance of median regression is worst. The results of the Wilcoxon test based on the drilling dataset identify the existence of statistically significant differences between the performances of LR and PCR, and PR and median regression models.&lt;/p&gt;

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_imp - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

20300 - Mechanical engineering

Project

—

Continuities

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Publication year

2021

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

Materials

ISSN

1996-1944

e-ISSN

—

Volume of the periodical

14

Issue of the periodical within the volume

21

Country of publishing house

CH - SWITZERLAND

Number of pages

15

Pages from-to

—

UT code for WoS article

000718536800001

EID of the result in the Scopus database

2-s2.0-85119255332