All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Accurate Estimation of Tensile Strength of 3D Printed Parts Using Machine Learning Algorithms

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27230%2F22%3A10250054" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27230/22:10250054 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/10/6/1158" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/10/6/1158</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pr10061158" target="_blank" >10.3390/pr10061158</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Accurate Estimation of Tensile Strength of 3D Printed Parts Using Machine Learning Algorithms

  • Original language description

    Manufacturing processes need optimization. Three-dimensional (3D) printing is not an exception. Consequently, 3D printing process parameters must be accurately calibrated to fabricate objects with desired properties irrespective of their field of application. One of the desired properties of a 3D printed object is its tensile strength. Without predictive models, optimizing the 3D printing process for achieving the desired tensile strength can be a tedious and expensive exercise. This study compares the effectiveness of the following five predictive models (i.e., machine learning algorithms) used to estimate the tensile strength of 3D printed objects: (1) linear regression, (2) random forest regression, (3) AdaBoost regression, (4) gradient boosting regression, and (5) XGBoost regression. First, all the machine learning models are tuned for optimal hyperparameters, which control the learning process of the algorithms. Then, the results from each machine learning model are compared using several statistical metrics such as R-2, mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), maximum error, and median error. The XGBoost regression model is the most effective among the tested algorithms. It is observed that the five tested algorithms can be ranked as XG boost &gt; gradient boost &gt; AdaBoost &gt; random forest &gt; linear regression.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    20301 - Mechanical engineering

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2022

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Processes

  • ISSN

    2227-9717

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    10

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    6

  • Country of publishing house

    CH - SWITZERLAND

  • Number of pages

    16

  • Pages from-to

    nestrankovano

  • UT code for WoS article

    000817333900001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85132721393