Accurate Estimation of Tensile Strength of 3D Printed Parts Using Machine Learning Algorithms
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27230%2F22%3A10250054" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27230/22:10250054 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/10/6/1158" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/10/6/1158</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pr10061158" target="_blank" >10.3390/pr10061158</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Accurate Estimation of Tensile Strength of 3D Printed Parts Using Machine Learning Algorithms
Original language description
Manufacturing processes need optimization. Three-dimensional (3D) printing is not an exception. Consequently, 3D printing process parameters must be accurately calibrated to fabricate objects with desired properties irrespective of their field of application. One of the desired properties of a 3D printed object is its tensile strength. Without predictive models, optimizing the 3D printing process for achieving the desired tensile strength can be a tedious and expensive exercise. This study compares the effectiveness of the following five predictive models (i.e., machine learning algorithms) used to estimate the tensile strength of 3D printed objects: (1) linear regression, (2) random forest regression, (3) AdaBoost regression, (4) gradient boosting regression, and (5) XGBoost regression. First, all the machine learning models are tuned for optimal hyperparameters, which control the learning process of the algorithms. Then, the results from each machine learning model are compared using several statistical metrics such as R-2, mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), maximum error, and median error. The XGBoost regression model is the most effective among the tested algorithms. It is observed that the five tested algorithms can be ranked as XG boost > gradient boost > AdaBoost > random forest > linear regression.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
20301 - Mechanical engineering
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2022
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Processes
ISSN
2227-9717
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
10
Issue of the periodical within the volume
6
Country of publishing house
CH - SWITZERLAND
Number of pages
16
Pages from-to
nestrankovano
UT code for WoS article
000817333900001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85132721393