All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Knowing who occupies an office; purely contingent, necessary and impossible offices

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27240%2F24%3A10254788" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27240/24:10254788 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/61989592:15410/24:73627023

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-024-04596-x#citeas" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-024-04596-x#citeas</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-024-04596-x" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11229-024-04596-x</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Knowing who occupies an office; purely contingent, necessary and impossible offices

  • Original language description

    This paper examines different kinds of definite descriptions denoting purely contingent, necessary or impossible objects. The discourse about contingent/impossible/necessary objects can be organised in terms of rational questions to ask and answer relative to the modal profile of the entityin question. There are also limits on what it is rational to know about entities with this or that modal profile. We will also examine epistemic modalities; they are the kind of necessity and possibility that is determined by epistemic constraints related to knowledge or rationality. Definite descriptions denote so-called offices, roles, or things to be. We explicate these offices as partial functions from possible worlds to chronologies of objects of type alpha, where alpha is mostly the type of individuals. Our starting point is Prior&apos;s distinction between a &apos;weak&apos; and &apos;strong&apos; definite article &apos;the&apos;. In both cases, the definite description refers to at most one object; yet, in the case of the weak &apos;the&apos;, the referred object can change over time, while in the case of the strong &apos;the&apos;, the object referred to by the definite description is the same forever, once the office has been occupied. The main result we present is the way how to obtain a Wh-knowledge about who or what plays a given role presented by a hyper-office, i.e. procedure producing an office. Another no less important result concerns the epistemic necessity of the impossibility of knowing who or what occupies the impossible office presented by a hyper-office.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10102 - Applied mathematics

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2024

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Synthese

  • ISSN

    0039-7857

  • e-ISSN

    1573-0964

  • Volume of the periodical

    203

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    6

  • Country of publishing house

    NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS

  • Number of pages

    29

  • Pages from-to

    2-30

  • UT code for WoS article

    001243629900001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85195667592