A comparative study of workability classes using seven case studies of engineering-geological investigations of sewer systems in Northern Moravia
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27350%2F23%3A10252872" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27350/23:10252872 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85168354699&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f" target="_blank" >https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85168354699&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40461-6" target="_blank" >10.1038/s41598-023-40461-6</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
A comparative study of workability classes using seven case studies of engineering-geological investigations of sewer systems in Northern Moravia
Original language description
While the main focus of numerous engineering-geological investigations is to determine load-bearing capacity and settlement in engineering structures, this article aims to point at the specificity of sewer system engineering-geological investigations, which focuses on workability of soils and rocks. The study deals with workability class assessment of seven different sewer system localities. The significance of this research lies in the mutual comparison of workability class assessment of these seven localities in terms of two different workability standards. Each of the standards represents an independent model of assessment and classification of workability. The first standard (CSN 73 1001) classifies soils and rocks into seven workability classes, while the second (EN ISO 14688) comprises only three workability classes. Each of the approaches has its advantages and disadvantages. In comparison to the first one, the second standard permits faster and easier classification of rocks, but may be less fair to investors or developers when considering the real engineering-geological conditions and costs of implementation. Rocks were newly classified into three (easy, medium and difficult) categories of earthwork realization difficulty. In the study, 33 layers were classified in the category of easy realization of earthworks, 8 layers in the category of a medium degree of earthwork realization difficulty, and two layers in the category of a difficult realization of earthworks. (C) 2023, Springer Nature Limited.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
20101 - Civil engineering
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2023
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Scientific Reports
ISSN
2045-2322
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
13
Issue of the periodical within the volume
1
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
15
Pages from-to
—
UT code for WoS article
001050004400080
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85168354699