All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Application of selected weighting methods and TOPSIS method in regional disparities analysis

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27510%2F16%3A86098199" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27510/16:86098199 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Application of selected weighting methods and TOPSIS method in regional disparities analysis

  • Original language description

    The paper deals with a multicriteria analysis of regional disparities in the context of European cohesion. The elimination of the economic, social and territorial disparities among European regions is the primary objective of the European Union (EU). Thanks to EU Cohesion Policy, the regional disparities decreased over the past decade, however a wide gap has still remained between the less developed and the highly developed regions. In terms of the evaluation of regional disparities there is no uniform methodological approach to determination of weights of regional indicators and regional disparities assessment. The multicriteria decision making (MCDM) methods can be considered as a suitable and useful tool. The main aim of the paper is to outline the different weighting methods within MCMD method and compare the effects of their application in the regional disparities analysis namely on case study. The selected weighting methods are used to derive the weights of the regional indicators. The TOPSIS method is employed to rank the NUTS 2 regions in the selected EU countries according to their socio-economic development in the context of EU cohesion. An empirical study demonstrated a feasibility of the weighting and MCDM methods in quantitative evaluation of the regional disparities.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

    AH - Economics

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/EE2.3.20.0296" target="_blank" >EE2.3.20.0296: Research team for modelling of economic and financial processes at VSB-TU Ostrava</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2016

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    The 10th International Days of Statistics and Economics : conference proceedings : September 8-10, 2016, Prague, Czech Republic

  • ISBN

    978-80-87990-10-0

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

  • Number of pages

    10

  • Pages from-to

    1240-1249

  • Publisher name

    Melandrium

  • Place of publication

    Slaný

  • Event location

    Praha

  • Event date

    Sep 8, 2016

  • Type of event by nationality

    EUR - Evropská akce

  • UT code for WoS article

    000389515100123