All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Usability of the MCDM and multivariate methods in the process of the regional disparities evaluation: Case of the Visegrad Group

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27510%2F16%3A86098201" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27510/16:86098201 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Usability of the MCDM and multivariate methods in the process of the regional disparities evaluation: Case of the Visegrad Group

  • Original language description

    The paper deals with a problem of quantitative analysis of regional disparities in the context of the EU Cohesion Policy. Thanks to the EU Cohesion Policy, the regional disparities decreased over the past decade, however a wide gap has still remained between the less developed and the highly developed EU regions. In terms of the evaluation of regional disparities there is no uniform methodological approach to determination of weights of regional indicators and regional disparities assessment. The multicriteria decision making (MCDM) methods and multivariate methods (cluster analysis) can be considered as a suitable and useful tool. The aim of the paper is to evaluate and compare the development of regional disparities in the Visegrad Group in the years 2004 and 2014 by the selected MCDM and multivariate methods. The selected weighting method (CRITIC method) is used to derive the weights of the regional indicators. Based on TOPSIS method and cluster analysis, ranking of NUTS 2 regions and homogeneous clusters of regions are determined. In the conclusion the results of case study and the advantages and disadvantages of the selected quantitative methods in the regional disparities evaluation are discussed.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50202 - Applied Economics, Econometrics

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/EE2.3.20.0296" target="_blank" >EE2.3.20.0296: Research team for modelling of economic and financial processes at VSB-TU Ostrava</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2016

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    Proceedings of 14th International Scientific Conference Economic Policy in the European Union Member Countries: September 14-16, 2016, Petrovice u Karviné, Czech Republic. Part 2

  • ISBN

    978-80-7510-210-2

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

    neuvedeno

  • Number of pages

    10

  • Pages from-to

    471-480

  • Publisher name

    Slezská univerzita v Opavě, Obchodně podnikatelská fakulta v Karviné

  • Place of publication

    Karviná

  • Event location

    Petrovice u Karviné

  • Event date

    Sep 14, 2016

  • Type of event by nationality

    EUR - Evropská akce

  • UT code for WoS article

    000403638200050