All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Standards for Risk Management

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27510%2F16%3A86099733" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27510/16:86099733 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Standards for Risk Management

  • Original language description

    Risk is present in our everyday life and risk management is universal but in most circumstances an unstructured activity, based on common sense, relevant knowledge, experience and instinct. Project management has evolved over recent years into a mature professional discipline characterized by a formalized body of knowledge and the definition of systematic processes for the execution of a project. All these and possibly other factors as well, have resulted in growing numbers of books, articles and conferences being devoted to project risk management. This level of activity has also led to the development of a number of standards that prescribe for and advise organisations on the best way to manage their risks. Every meaningful standard for project management contains project risk management as its important part. The goal of this essay is to present and compare the main standards for project risk management that are currently available today. Four international standards recognized world-wide were selected for comparison: . PMI, . PRINCE2, . IPMA, . ISO 31000 and IEC 62198. Chapter 1 introduces the article, basic principles and concepts of risk management. Chapter 2 consists of brief recapitulation of the selected standards in a manner that facilitates their comparison. This is followed by a comparison in chapter 3 including discussion regarding the commonalities among the standards. Chapter 4 contains the conclusion.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

    AE - Management, administration and clerical work

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2016

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    IBIMA : proceedings of the 28th conference : November 9-10, 2016, Seville, Spain

  • ISBN

    978-0-9860419-8-3

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

  • Number of pages

    15

  • Pages from-to

    3638-3657

  • Publisher name

    IBIMA

  • Place of publication

    Norristown

  • Event location

    Sevilla

  • Event date

    Nov 9, 2016

  • Type of event by nationality

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • UT code for WoS article

    000392785700367