Risk Management Standards for Project Management

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27510%2F17%3A10236418" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27510/17:10236418 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2017.06.001" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2017.06.001</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2017.06.001" target="_blank" >10.21833/ijaas.2017.06.001</a>

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Risk Management Standards for Project Management
Original language description
The purpose of this paper is to present and compare the main standards for project risk management that are currently available today. Four international standards recognized world-wide were selected for comparison: PMI, PRINCE2, IPMA, ISO 31000 and IEC 62198. Project management has evolved over recent years into a mature professional discipline characterized by a formalized body of knowledge and the definition of systematic processes for the execution of a project. All these and possibly other factors as well, have resulted in growing numbers of books, articles and conferences being devoted to project risk management. This level of activity has also led to the development of a number of standards that prescribe for and advise organizations on the best way to manage their risks. Every meaningful standard for project management contains project risk management as its important part.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50204 - Business and management

Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year
2017
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)