Prognostic Accuracy of Three COPD Classification Systems in Relation to Long-Term Mortality of COPD Patients: A Prospective Multicenter Study
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15110%2F19%3A73600841" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15110/19:73600841 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216224:14110/19:00109670 RIV/00216208:11150/19:10398648 RIV/65269705:_____/19:00070530 RIV/00179906:_____/19:10398648 RIV/00843989:_____/19:E0107800
Result on the web
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00408-019-00196-6" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00408-019-00196-6</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00408-019-00196-6" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00408-019-00196-6</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Prognostic Accuracy of Three COPD Classification Systems in Relation to Long-Term Mortality of COPD Patients: A Prospective Multicenter Study
Original language description
Recent research showed group B patients express higher mortality compared to group C patients when GOLD A-D grouping is used. We aimed to compare the prognostic accuracy of three GOLD classification systems, I–IV (“pre-2011”), A-D (“2011–2016”) and A-D (“2017–present”) in relation to mortality, exacerbation risk, quality of life (QoL) assessment and specific treatments use in a real-life COPD cohort. We used the data of 720 patients from the Czech Multicenter Research Database of COPD. Four-year mortality and time-to-exacerbation using the GOLD “pre-2011”, “2011–2016” and “2017–present” classification schemes were assessed. Moreover, distribution of specific treatments use and QoL measures were analyzed. The GOLD I-IV classification system showed gradual increase in 4-year mortality across the stages (GOLD II 18.8%, III 28.5%, IV 38.7%) (p = 0.001). Using the A-D “2011–2016” classification scheme, group C patients had lower mortality (16.7%) than group B (18.7%) (p = 0.009). The A-D “2017–present” classification showed higher mortality in group B (25.5%) compared to group C (20%) (p = 0.05). For additional outcomes, the GOLD I–IV scheme showed highest match between the calculated 4-year exacerbation risk and QoL measures and GOLD stage/grouping. In terms of specific treatment distributions, various patterns for each GOLD classification system were observed with best match of GOLD “2017–present” system to the layout of GOLD groups and categories. We conclude the GOLD I–IV classification system had the highest accuracy related to mortality, QoL measures and exacerbation risk prediction, while the A-D “2017–present” scheme was most accurate within severity of symptoms prediction reflected also by more frequent specific treatments use.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30203 - Respiratory systems
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2019
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
LUNG
ISSN
0341-2040
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
197
Issue of the periodical within the volume
2
Country of publishing house
DE - GERMANY
Number of pages
7
Pages from-to
173-179
UT code for WoS article
000466205900009
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85061043758