All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Subsidiarity of Human Rights in Practice: The Relationship between the Constitutional Court and Lower Courts in Czechia

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15220%2F19%3A73587981" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15220/19:73587981 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0924051918820987" target="_blank" >https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0924051918820987</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0924051918820987" target="_blank" >10.1177/0924051918820987</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Subsidiarity of Human Rights in Practice: The Relationship between the Constitutional Court and Lower Courts in Czechia

  • Original language description

    The principle of subsidiarity is viewed as the cornerstone of the protection of human rights. Internationally, it is primarily the responsibility of states to ensure that human rights are respected and protected on a domestic level and any international protection mechanism is only supplementary. Taken to the domestic level, apex courts in a country also provide only subsidiary protection of human rights, which must first and foremost be protected by lower level courts. Subsidiarity has two facets – the obligation of lower courts directly applying human rights and the corresponding deference of higher courts. Little attention has been given so far to how subsidiarity of human rights works in practice and how human rights are in fact applied by the primary level of court systems. The paper uses Czechia as a case study to test a hypothesis that if lower courts apply human rights then there is a lower chance that the Constitutional Court as an apex court will find a human rights violation in that case. This dependence is indicative that subsidiarity actually works in practice.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50501 - Law

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA16-07776S" target="_blank" >GA16-07776S: The application of human rights by first and second instance courts</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2019

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights

  • ISSN

    0924-0519

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    31

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS

  • Number of pages

    16

  • Pages from-to

    69-84

  • UT code for WoS article

    000460637000006

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85070745041