Collective Self-Defence and the Internationalisation of Armed Conflicts in the DRC
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15220%2F24%3A73630065" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15220/24:73630065 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Collective Self-Defence and the Internationalisation of Armed Conflicts in the DRC
Original language description
SADC’s entry into the conflict and the accusations against Rwanda, regarding both its support for the M23 and its direct involvement in the conflict, raise a number of questions under the jus ad bellum and jus in bello. From the jus ad bellum perspective, SADC’s reliance on collective self-defense is particularly interesting to note. It may suggest that SADC interprets the right of self-defense as applying against non-State actors (the M23). Alternatively, SADC may consider that the actions of the M23 are attributable to Rwanda (although it does not seem to have publicly accused Rwanda of supporting the movement).
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
O - Miscellaneous
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50501 - Law
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2024
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů