All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

The Energy Charter Treaty and International Environmental Law: Systemic Integration as a Tool for Treaty Reconciliation

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15220%2F25%3A73632964" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15220/25:73632964 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    The Energy Charter Treaty and International Environmental Law: Systemic Integration as a Tool for Treaty Reconciliation

  • Original language description

    The fragmentation of international law has given rise to normative tensions between international investment law and international environmental obligations, particularly in the context of climate change. The Energy Charter Treaty (ECT), a multilateral investment treaty designed to promote and protect energy investments, has come under intense scrutiny for its perceived incompatibility with states’ environmental commitments, including those under the Paris Agreement. This contribution explores the interpretive space within the ECT to accommodate environmental obligations, focusing on systemic integration under Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT) as a doctrinal and normative tool to reconcile competing treaty regimes.Systemic integration requires that treaty provisions be interpreted in light of “any relevant rules of international law applicable in the relations between the parties”. This contribution argues that this principle offers a legally grounded mechanism for integrating environmental norms, both treaty-based and customary, into the interpretation of investment protections under the ECT, such as fair and equitable treatment and indirect expropriation. The conclusion is drawn on arbitral jurisprudence where tribunals have either engaged with or failed to consider systemic integration in contexts involving environmental regulation, including cases such as RWE v. Netherlands, Rockhopper v. Italy, and Greentech v. Italy.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    C - Chapter in a specialist book

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50501 - Law

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Book/collection name

    Contemporary Issues of International Environmental Law

  • ISBN

    978-80-7160-769-4

  • Number of pages of the result

    35

  • Pages from-to

    315-350

  • Number of pages of the book

    488

  • Publisher name

    Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Právnická fakulta

  • Place of publication

    Bratislava

  • UT code for WoS chapter