Algebraic structures formalizing the logic with unsharp implication and negation
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15310%2F25%3A73633165" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15310/25:73633165 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://academic.oup.com/jigpal/article/33/1/36/7316294" target="_blank" >https://academic.oup.com/jigpal/article/33/1/36/7316294</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzad023" target="_blank" >10.1093/jigpal/jzad023</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Algebraic structures formalizing the logic with unsharp implication and negation
Original language description
It is well-known that intuitionistic logics can be formalized by means of Heyting algebras, i.e. relatively pseudocomplemented semilattices. Within such algebras the logical connectives implication and conjunction are formalized as the relative pseudocomplement and the semilattice operation meet, respectively. If the Heyting algebra has a bottom element 0, then the relative pseudocomplement with respect to 0 is called the pseudocomplement and it is considered as the connective negation in this logic. Our idea is to consider an arbitrary meet-semilattice with 0 satisfying only the Ascending Chain Condition (these assumptions are trivially satisfied in finite meet-semilattices) and introduce the operators formalizing the connectives negation x0 and implication x → y as the set of all maximal elements z satisfying x ⴷ z = 0 and as the set of all maximal elements z satisfying x ⴷ z ≤ y, respectively. Such a negation and implication is ‘unsharp’ since it assigns to one entry x or to two entries x and y belonging to the semilattice, respectively, a subset instead of an element of the semilattice. Surprisingly, this kind of negation and implication still shares a number of properties of these connectives in intuitionistic logic, in particular the derivation rule Modus Ponens. Moreover, unsharp negation and unsharp implication can be characterized by means of five, respectively seven simple axioms. We present several examples. The concepts of a deductive system and of a filter are introduced as well as the congruence determined by such a filter. We finally describe certain relationships between these concepts.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10101 - Pure mathematics
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/GF20-09869L" target="_blank" >GF20-09869L: The many facets of orthomodularity</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
LOGIC JOURNAL OF THE IGPL
ISSN
1367-0751
e-ISSN
1368-9894
Volume of the periodical
33
Issue of the periodical within the volume
1
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
13
Pages from-to
"36 "- 48
UT code for WoS article
001084835400001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85217628657